Spain and Catalonia politics is the second most discussed constitutional crisis in Europe after Britain exist from the European Union. Although Spain and Catalonia reality forms the basis of the future of nation-states around the world, pundits have taken sides on this particular issue. Fortunately, Sujit Choudhry is one of the few law scholars that are giving this discourse a better setting, refer to (Facebook.com). Choudhry, who is one of the most respected legal scholars, believes that taking sides widens the already rift between Spain Catalonian governments. He firmly believes the issue can only be solved through dialogue since constitutional means have been unsuccessful.
Having a dialogue according to Sujit Choudhry will be for the interests of Spanish people especially Catalonians. As a scholar, Sujit Choudhry believes that the best route out of this constitutional crisis is by acknowledging the fact that a referendum is the best way to handle the secession issue, read (Sujitchoudhry.com). Although the scholar points out that the previous polls have failed to either take part in, have been unable to reflect the will of the people, having Spanish government support will be ideal. According to Sujit Choudhry, it is a reality that many people from Catalonia want to separate from Spain, and it is their democratic right to secession.
Through a letter to both parties in this succession discourse, Sujit Choudhry explores some factors that will shape the future of the two entities. Although he points out that the European Union is also a factor for Catalonia in case the secession goes through, the people’s right to decide is supreme. As a respected legal mind, Sujit Choudhry this stand is probably one of the simplest yet one of the most important angles to ending this debate. He acknowledges the fact that both parties have a part to play in the overall consultation between them.
Spain and Catalonia issue is one of the many subject matters that Sujit Choudhry is interested in as a public intellectual. It is impressive to see gifted people in the legal world contributing to issues of great importance especially to the future of states. The New York University graduate believes that the scholarly world has a part to play for a more stable future, as posted on medium.com.
Politics and constitutional law are the main areas of focus for Professor Sujit Choudhry, one of the leading scholars in the field of such research. He is highly versed in all forms of constitutional law, including the development of constitutional law and its evolution over time. He has written and published a number of pieces on these various subjects, and his most recent piece discusses what could be a growing issue in constitutional democracies
Choudhry’s discussion begins with a dissection of a tweet published by ex-Attorney General Eric Holder in which Holder claimed that if Robert Mueller or the Russia investigation were hindered in any way by the Trump administration, the American people would have to come out and peacefully protest the move to show that they don’t accept the unconstitutionality of the situation. Choudhry calls this ‘red line’, which is really nothing more than a constitutional rule, a focal point. Another focal point is presidential term limits.
According to Professor Sujit Choudhry, when these red lines are crossed, it represents a sort of failure of democracy. He provides an example based on the situation in Poland that has been evolving since a right-wing group obtained majority control over the legislature. They have since been using legal means to change the constitution so they can remain in power, which starts to blur the lines between a true democracy and an absolute dictatorship.
The commentary released by Choudhry reflects some of the political climate in the United States simply because of the attitudes and efforts of the Trump administration to undermine the legal process. He claims that the threats to democracy have been steadily growing since the Cold War, and that they are more likely now than ever before. Parties that want to gain control are learning that it is easier to do so legally than by force.
Essentially, the idea put forth by Choudhry centers around the notion that democracies must be watched and regulated very closely if they are to remain legitimate. He warns that ‘democratic backsliding’ could send a functioning democracy back to authoritarian rule. Part of this, he reasons, is that the world’s stage has accepted that democracy, at least on its face, is the optimal system. That doesn’t necessarily mean that a system that calls itself democratic has to actually follow any truly democratic practices. It just means that world leaders are getting better at amassing and holding power by misleading the people. Related article on blogs.law.nyu.edu.